Better PensacolaTake our survey
Welcome to the Better Pensacola Forum blog. Please remember that this site is accessible to people of all ages. Better Pensacola Forum reserves the right to remove all unsigned, anonymous comments as well as any vulgar or defamatory remarks.

Archive for January, 2010

How does size impact a city’s quality of life?

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

Today’s blog begins a multi-part series that will look at 9 factors that influence a city’s livability. This series was inspired by an interview with musician turned author David Byrne that appeared in the September 11, 2009 issue of the Wall Street Journal. A link to the original article will follow this post.

According to David Byrne’s article, size is one of the nine factors that determine how livable a city is. If a city is too small, it is harder for individuals to find anonymity. In smaller cities, failures are remembered for a much longer period of time than in larger cities. Yet, it is this willingness to take risks, to try new things, to be willing to fail that generates new thoughts and leads to innovation. However, a city cannot be so large that the level of anonymity restricts residents from building communities and relationships. As we discussed last week, social capital is a major component of a successful city.

As a mid-sized metropolitan area, Pensacola offers a large enough area to provide anonymity, yet it is small enough to encourage community building relationships. However, Pensacola seems to be tied to a small town mentality. Perhaps it is time to look to other cities of similar size for inspiration on the best ways to make our size, and our assets, work for us.

Other successful metropolitan areas of similar size include Provo, UT , Madison, WI, and Reno, NV. Provo and Madison were both ranked in the Top 10 for quality of life for mid-sized metros, according to Biz Journals. Pensacola was ranked 80th out of 124 mid-sized metros.

The report listed the top 5 strengths for each of the top 10 metro areas. For Provo, Utah those strengths were : 1. Sizable inventory of large houses, 2. Strong population growth, 3. Relatively low unemployment rate, 4. Decent percentage of workers living close to home, 5. Nice selection of new houses.

For Madison, WI those strengths were: 1. Solid concentration of management jobs, 2. Strong concentration of adults with bachelor’s degrees, 3. Solid corps of young adults, 4. Sizable percentage of adults with advanced degrees, 5. Heavy share of adults with high school diplomas. You can view information on the remainder of the top 10 finalists here.

What can we learn from these other mid-sized cities to maximize our potential as a mid-sized city, and make the most of our size?

To read the David Byrne article in its entirety, please click here.

Social Capital: What is it, and how can it help us?

Monday, January 11th, 2010

Rebecca Ryan, author of Live First, Work Second, spoke at the Pensacola Chamber of Commerce luncheon last fall. During her presentation, she mentioned the importance of social capital to grow a city.

According to Wikipedia, social capital refers to the connections within and between social networks, and the belief that social networks have value, and in turn improve the productivity of individuals and groups. As individuals, we use these social networks through sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter. Our social capital can assist us in landing job interviews, grant us access to events with entertainers we enjoy, or help us find like minded individuals. Can social capital also improve our city?

In his pioneering study, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community Harvard political scientist Robert D. Putnam wrote: “Henry Ward Beecher’s advice a century ago to ‘multiply picnics’ is not entirely ridiculous today. We should do this, ironically, not because it will be good for America — though it will be — but because it will be good for us.” Putnam found an overall decline in social capital in America over the past fifty years, which may be contributing to the degradation of American society.

There are two types of social capital, bonding and bridging. Bonding refers to social networks between homogeneous groups of people (such as sororities and fraternities) and bridging refers to that of social networks between socially heterogeneous groups (such as church choirs, bowling or recreational sports leagues).

It is believed that increased amounts of bridging social capital will reduce a multitude of social problems within a community, and society as a whole. This is linked to the result of individuals becoming connected to community problems through their interactions with individuals from different socio-economic backgrounds. For example, the wife of a successful physician may not feel the impacts of a budget cut to mass transit, but by being a member of a choir, she may meet the sister of a single mother who relies on the transit system for transportation. This humanizes the problem. Bridging social capital keeps social problems from getting out of hand by keeping individuals within two degrees of separation from social problems.

Is it possible that a lack of bridging social capital is contributing to the dissatisfaction among many Escambia County residents? Is it possible to eradicate many social problems simply by reaching out to our neighbors and becoming involved in our communities? Share your thoughts with us—it’s good for our community.


© Better Pensacola Forum 2009
About Better Pensacola ForumContact UsAdmin Log In